LAMP-REY = LAMP Readily Exploitable, Yes?. :-)
From: Ale [mailto:ale-***@ale.org] On Behalf Of Jim Kinney
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2017 11:32 AM
To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts
Subject: Re: [ale] LAMP vs Node/Flask/RoR etc
On Wed, 2017-11-01 at 10:57 -0400, DJ-Pfulio wrote:
On 11/01/2017 10:05 AM, leam hall wrote:
Not bashing anyone's web thingy of choice but am trying to understand
something.
We used to swear by the LAMP stack; Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP. Each
thing separate but working together. Now things like Node, RoR, and
Flask function as both web server and page generation systems.
Besides "one language", are the new things that much better, or worse,
than Apache/Nginz and PHP?
Who is "we"? Lots of people never liked LAMP.
Ha! JD ran his personal website using PHP on Win2k server for _years_!
<runs and hides>
(I think JD would rather have his eyelids riveted to his tongue and nose than use php on any platform and certainly with any windows version being dead last after hand typing return code on a Mac II surrounded by cattle prods with his feet in a bucket of scorpions. I may be exaggerating a bit but not by much.)
Seriously, LAMP was just another buzzword. It was a certainly common tool chain but most certainly not the only game in town. It was popular since it was easy to get started with. It was also easy to break and typically was run by people who had little to no knowledge of, or interest in, security of data, transactions, web servers, etc...
There were always other combos - I refuse to use MySQL and have done well with PostgreSQL for 20+ years. Perl was my first web scripting language. Other use Python. Even bash. The two parts that were always there for years were Linux and Apache. Ngnx has moved up.
_______________________________________________
Ale mailing list
***@ale.org<mailto:***@ale.org>
http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo